Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:03:48 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: cpio write(2) return value checks

Yes, I know.. but in this way in future work may prove more difficult.
Owl has a very high quality code, and need to take care of it in all
areas. I could not understand why this change something that has
already been changed.

daniel


2011/9/16 Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>:
> Daniel,
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 18:39 +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
>> --- cpio-2.10.90.old/src/copyin.c.orig        2011-09-15 06:03:13.645164165 +0000
>> +++ cpio-2.10.90/src/copyin.c.orig    2011-09-15 06:03:21.775176098 +0000
> [...]
>> --- cpio/src/copyin.c
>> +++ cpio/src/copyin.c
>> @@ -373,12 +373,12 @@ create_final_defers ()
>
> copyin.c.orig is just a garbage.  It's not a bug, however, thanks for noticing :-)
>
> --
> Vasiliy
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ