|
|
Message-ID: <CAAHN_R31+jha61vPK-_p4QGij9VcCBFm22v=cB-8QpnWDxbvJA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 21:26:20 -0400 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: The GNU C Library security advisory update for 2026-09-10 The following security advisory has been published: GLIBC-SA-2026-0016: =================== Stack overflow in nscd due to unbounded alloca use The nscd service in the GNU C Library 2.3.4 and newer may crash due to a stack overflow when a malicious DNS server returns too large a response for a DNS query, resulting in degraded DNS resolution for the system. Exploitation of this bug needs a system that has nscd enabled and using an untrusted DNS server for name resolution, with the compromised DNS server being capable of processing records large enough to result in a stack overflow in an nscd thread stack. During experimentation, bind 9 was unable to handle large records, but that could change in future or with a different name server. In typical installations, nscd is executed in an isolated context as its own user without a shell, due to which any compromise of that service is isolated. There is a remote possibility of nscd cache corruption if an attacker manages to get the stack pointer into a desired point in the heap, potentially resulting in other caches in nscd being overwritten with corrupt data through the stack overflow, until the buggy code path eventually results in a crash. Finally, a crash in nscd may result in performance degradation when resolving names, but it does not result in a denial of service. CVE-Id: CVE-2026-89092 CVSS: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L - 4.2 Public-Date: 2026-09-10 Vulnerable-Commit: d19687d6ebc545b633e14c07429f7892a599d0b9 Reported-by: Anmol Singh Rajput Notes: ====== Published advisories are available directly in the project git repository: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=tree;f=advisories;hb=HEAD
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.