|
|
Message-ID: <517e44be-1ae8-46af-b0f1-f07ea04a1053@cpansec.org> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:24:06 +0100 From: Robert Rothenberg <rrwo@...nsec.org> To: cve-announce@...urity.metacpan.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: CVE-2026-75589: Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl check HMAC-SHA1, HMAC-SHA256 and PLAINTEXT signatures with a non-constant-time comparison in verify ======================================================================== CVE-2026-75589 CPAN Security Group ======================================================================== CVE ID: CVE-2026-75589 Distribution: Net-OAuth Versions: before 0.33 MetaCPAN: https://metacpan.org/dist/Net-OAuth VCS Repo: https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl check HMAC-SHA1, HMAC-SHA256 and PLAINTEXT signatures with a non-constant-time comparison in verify Description ----------- Net::OAuth versions before 0.33 for Perl check HMAC-SHA1, HMAC-SHA256 and PLAINTEXT signatures with a non-constant-time comparison in verify. Each of the three compares the signature carried in the message against the locally computed one with the eq operator, which returns as soon as the two strings differ. The time taken to reject a signature varies with the length of the matching prefix. RSA-SHA1 is not affected, as it verifies through the RSA key object rather than by comparing strings. A client that can submit messages and time the replies may recover a valid signature one byte at a time rather than searching the whole signature space. Under PLAINTEXT the value compared against is the signature key itself, so the search recovers consumer_secret and token_secret. Problem types ------------- - CWE-208 Observable Timing Discrepancy Solutions --------- Upgrade to Net-OAuth 0.33 or later. References ---------- https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xr-69p3-gw56 https://github.com/vurtdev/Net-OAuth/commit/a1a16b58add85668ef4fcda642a486ceed098eba.patch https://metacpan.org/release/RRWO/Net-OAuth-0.33/changes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.