Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 16:20:24 +0200 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Linux kernel: stack buffer overflow with controlled payload in get_options() function On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 10:08:23AM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote: > I can't magically guess when someone is or isn't acting on behalf of > their employer If/when you feel it matters, you can ask them. > When people post from @google.com I similarly consider that to be a > statement from a Google employee. Not *on behalf of Google* but speaking > as an employee of Google? Definitely. Fair enough. I think there's a difference between "speaking as an employee of ..." (a lot of people often do) and "spokesperson for ..." (is rarely the case). > I don't think it was completely unproductive though. That's my assessment too - "not completely unproductive". > And no I'm not going to be civil if That's a problem. Please do try to be civil no matter what. If you're deliberately not being civil when you post in here, that's a reason for me as a moderator to start rejecting your messages. And to make it clear: no reply is expected to this message, nor to anything else in this thread. Let's end the thread right here. Thanks! Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ