Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:24:24 -0500
From: Brandon Perry <bperry.volatile@...il.com>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
 cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: Handful of libass issues


> On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:39 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:23:22PM -0400, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
>>> The third is a huge memory allocation leading to a crash that wasn't
>>> fixed because a good solution is unavailable at the moment.
>> 
>> Use CVE-2016-7971.
> 
> It looks from the discussion in
> https://github.com/libass/libass/pull/240 that this issue is disputed
> to be actually in libass.
> 

For context, while the input caused a crash with AFL (not fuzzing with ASAN) and it crashes with ASAN, I was unable to reproduce the crash with libass externally. I was only able to take up a hug amount of memory and take a long time to finish parsing the input.

I asked if they dev wanted to reject the CVE but got no strong response either way, so I decided to not pursue it.

> Should the CVE assignment be revisited, possibly rejected, according
> the upstream discussion?
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (843 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ