Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 09:53:24 +0200 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: CVE Assignments MITRE <cve-assign@...re.org> Subject: Re: CVE Request: gdk-pixbuf: Additional fixes to protect against overlows in pixops_* functions (similar to CVE-2015-7674) Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:23:02AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi > > CVE-2015-7674, an interger overflow flaw in the pixops_scale_nearest > function, was fixed by > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gdk-pixbuf/commit/?id=e9a5704edaa9aee9498f1fbf6e1b70fcce2e55aa > > There is another commit in the gdk-pixbuf repository to fix overflows > in the pixops_composite_nearest, pixops_composite_color_nearest and > pixops_process functions: > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gdk-pixbuf/commit/?id=dbfe8f70471864818bf458a39c8a99640895bd22 > > Can you aassing an additional CVE for this since the scope for > CVE-2015-7674 was for the pixops_scale_nearest function? I realise I did not made that clear: The two commits were not fixed in the same release, the initial one resulting in CVE-2015-7674 is contained in 2.32.1, wereas the second commit came later in 2.33.1. Regards, Salvatore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ