[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:10:41 +0000
From: Jeremy Stanley <jeremy@...nstack.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE for crypto_get_random() from libsrtp
On 2015-08-11 14:58:10 +0200 (+0200), Adam Maris wrote:
> On 11/08/15 13:48, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2015-08-11 09:51:50 +0200 (+0200), Adam Maris wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Unless CVE is assigned, we don't plan to ship any patch at the
> > > moment.
[...]
> > if a CVE is assigned for a bug you consider to have minimal
> > impact, do you release a patch for it anyway just because
> > there's a CVE?
[...]
> If a CVE is assigned for this issue, we will create an entry in
> our CVE database but the end result will likely be the same,
> wontfix.
That makes more sense. I read your initial "Unless CVE is assigned"
comment to mean that you were going to base your decision on whether
to distribute a fix on MITRE's classification process rather than on
your own due diligence. Thanks for clarifying!
--
Jeremy Stanley
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
