Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:55:51 +0000 From: Ankeet Presswala <mythic.boost@...il.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Cc: bperry.volatile@...il.com Subject: Re: Qualys Security Advisory - CVE-2015-3245 userhelper - CVE-2015-3246 libuser Whatever happened to the half-life of vulnerabilities? From https://community.qualys.com/blogs/laws-of-vulnerabilities/2015/01/27/the-ghost-vulnerability : "Where can I download the exploit? We want to give everyone enough time to patch. According to our data once the vulnerability has reached its half-life we will release the exploit. Half-life is the time interval measuring a reduction of a vulnerability’s occurrence by half. Over time, this metric shows how successful efforts have been to eradicate vulnerability. A shorter half-life indicates faster remediation. Half-life was originally coined by Qualys in the Laws of Vulnerability." On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:53 AM mancha <mancha1@...o.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Brandon Perry wrote: > > Prefer the term coordinated disclosure. > > > > Sent from a phone > > > > > On Jul 24, 2015, at 10:56 AM, mancha <mancha1@...o.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:43:43PM +0200, Leif Nixon wrote: Qualys > > >> Security Advisory <qsa@...lys.com> writes: > > >> > > >>> Hello, it is July 23, 2015, 17:00 UTC, the Coordinated Release > > >>> Date for CVE-2015-3245 and CVE-2015-3246. Please find our > > >>> advisory below, and our exploit attached. > > >> > > >> *Why* are you releasing a full exploit just minutes after the patch > > >> is released? > > >> > > >> (Disclosure: I am employed by Red Hat, but this is my purely > > >> personal question.) > > >> > > >> -- Leif Nixon > > > > > > There was absolutely nothing wrong with Qualys' timing. When the > > > embargo ends, it ends. > > > > > > The real problem is the underlying model: "responsible disclosure". > > > It's nothing more than a CYA strategy that doesn't maximize the > > > ecosystem's welfare. The positive-sounding name fools some into > > > thinking it a good thing. > > > > > > --mancha > > Agreed. Coordinated disclosure is much more precise. > > Also, it's judgment-free unlike the loaded term "responsible disclosure" > that implies alternative disclosure models like full disclosure are > irresponsible. > > --mancha >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ