Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:03:58 +0300 From: gremlin@...mlin.ru To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Question about world readable config files and commented warnings On 2015-06-29 23:11:08 -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote: > So, if a config file is world readable by default, but the section > where you might put a password says: > # Database URI for the database that stores the package > # information. If it contains a password, make sure to > # adjust the permissions of the config > Is that good enough, e.g. no CVE, or do we actually need to have > proper permissions? For me, that means: the developers did their best, everything else is up to package maintainers. And, obviously, when the administrators will fill in the connection parameters, they most likely will see this warning. > I'm thinking we need proper permissions and not a note (especially > with administration tools/etc that may parse/modify the file > but not change the perms). My experience says that developers' attempts to perform chmod (or, even worse, chown) during `make install` are just ugly (at least they never check whether DESTDIR is empty). -- Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin <gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru> GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ