Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:27:46 -0700 From: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@...onical.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: USBCreator D-Bus service On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:04:23AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote: > Either way, it sounds weird to keep a low severity issue private. Low > severity usually means not needing an embargo in the first place. But I > guess it was the vendor's preference? In this case, no, Ubuntu would have preferred several days embargo for this issue. Hypothetically speaking, Monday would have been ideal, as we prefer to not release updates on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. We treat local root escalation vulnerabilities with a high priority. Please do inform us privately of further local root escalations in the future, either via security@...ntu.com or filing "private security" bugs against the corresponding package in Launchpad. Thanks 1: Our priorities don't directly map to issue severities, but local root escalations are treated highly: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/ubuntu-cve-tracker/master/view/head:/README#L215 [ CONTENT OF TYPE application/pgp-signature SKIPPED ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ