Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:29:59 +0200 From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com CC: cve-assign@...re.org Subject: Re: Re: Problems in automatic crash analysis frameworks On 04/14/2015 05:55 PM, cve-assign@...re.org wrote: > This is mostly a question for the persons who assigned CVE-2015-1318 > and CVE-2015-1862. Should these CVE assignments be interpreted to > mean: > > CVE-2015-1318 - in Apport, an unprivileged user can use a > namespace-based attack because there is an execve by > root after a chroot into a user-specified directory > > CVE-2015-1862 - in ABRT, an unprivileged user can use a > namespace-based attack because there is an execve by > root after a chroot into a user-specified directory > > with "Furthermore, Abrt suffers from numerous race conditions and > symlink problems" not yet mapped to any CVE IDs? Yes, that's how most of us assumed how the assignments were made, but there is quite a bit of confusion about CVE-2015-1862 because Tavis and others associated it with the raceabrt.c exploit. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ