Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:25:19 -0600 From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com CC: cve-assign@...re.org Subject: Re: Re: Problems in automatic crash analysis frameworks On 04/14/2015 09:55 AM, cve-assign@...re.org wrote: > This is mostly a question for the persons who assigned CVE-2015-1318 > and CVE-2015-1862. Should these CVE assignments be interpreted to > mean: > > CVE-2015-1318 - in Apport, an unprivileged user can use a > namespace-based attack because there is an execve by > root after a chroot into a user-specified directory > > CVE-2015-1862 - in ABRT, an unprivileged user can use a > namespace-based attack because there is an execve by > root after a chroot into a user-specified directory > > with "Furthermore, Abrt suffers from numerous race conditions and > symlink problems" not yet mapped to any CVE IDs? (CVE-2012-5660 is a Because I asked Taviso to report them publicly, rather than play whack-a-mole and do it slowly on distros, I'd rather do this out in the open and all at once =). > similar but older issue.) These additional ABRT issues would seem to > be, for example, independently relevant on a system where the kernel > was built without namespaces support. However, the raceabrt.c > attachment says "This is a race condition exploit for CVE-2015-1862." -- Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 [ CONTENT OF TYPE application/pgp-signature SKIPPED ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ