[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 17:52:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: cve-assign@...re.org
To: fweimer@...hat.com
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: libX11: buffer overflow in MakeBigReq macro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Does this assignment cover application code which has to be recompiled
> because it included an expansion of broken macro?
It might be worthwhile to answer this in two ways.
First, the scope of the CVE-2013-7439 assignment does cover
application code that was built with this macro, in the sense that
applications cannot have their own unique CVE IDs for the same
problem. In other words, if building with this macro is what is
calling an application's security into question, then there wouldn't
be a separate CVE ID for that application.
Second, if an application's vendor wants to publish a security
advisory mapping to CVE-2013-7439, then it is preferable for the
vendor to verify that the existence of the macro actually has a
security impact for that application. However, there is no reasonable
way for the MITRE CVE team to require that. An application's vendor
might not have the resources or expertise. For example, the
application's vendor optionally could decide to map to CVE-2013-7439
based only on noticing that the macro is used.
In any case, the information posted by others in this thread would be
very useful for risk-assessment questions that go beyond "how can this
CVE ID be used."
- --
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVJvNSAAoJEKllVAevmvmsCdIH/A9SWB+8BaxQhyasFAXKz8Qg
0ikGPGWFOraNdbr46sLC4MhYfE80fNzcurlmTemEsN7xmnmnhRbLjmCPQifYHJ+7
PMs8eFQxVi91gNCptVn7YWpmtdwI+AzcQeJvezXvWwVsrVktf0/7KvXH5F9zeQ3l
jk9z2nXTt42e/Kk8JcpIKixS1Em1oNt/YKHBIOz79ufjbCiM1UxAE1aMo2e04YKA
YCYoPNgMB4eKUiHazTo2HBtm+6u+E2+/+lb008/mnh6fRl+XhVm3gPURpsGgJM+7
njrDI0eeO5iU6XFSR6pf/Qp+OHNts8hb0U2DKuKlxfMaUZvswlNAZsJHOcl1u/U=
=DjB/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
