Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:00:35 +0100 From: Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: GHOST gethostbyname() heap overflow in glibc (CVE-2015-0235) Hi all, As promised, I wrote down my lengthy thoughts in a blog post: https://blog.hboeck.de/archives/864-What-the-GHOST-tells-us-about-free-software-vulnerability-management.html On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:50:01 -0700 Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote: > This is why for example I've been trying to make CVE's easily > available so people are more likely to come to us with borderline > issues ("I'm not sure but this looks weird and may be security > related"). I'm also working on a set of examples for the CVE HOWTO so > again developers will hopefully be able to realize when things look > weird and may be a security issue and not just a flaw. I'm trying to > find ways to help educate people/make it easier for them to report > security issues but this is a non trivial problem. Regarding CVEs - I made similar experiences as Michal. It's very mixed, sometimes I get CVEs quickly, sometimes I don't get answers to requests. I would like the CVE process to be a better tool to organize this (as I've written in my blog post), but right now I feel it's not working reliably enough for that. At some point I stopped caring too much about CVEs because I felt waiting for them stops me from reporting more issues. cu, -- Hanno Böck http://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: hanno@...eck.de GPG: BBB51E42 [ CONTENT OF TYPE application/pgp-signature SKIPPED ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ