[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:20:03 -0800
From: Korvin Szanto <Korvin@...tlandlabs.com>
To: Simo Ben youssef <simo@...xploit.com>
Cc: Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi>, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, cve-assign@...re.org,
abuse@...crete5.org, security@...crete5.org
Subject: Re: CVE request: Concrete5 XSS vulnerability
That report unfortunately fell through the cracks, as you can see on
my reply. Our disclosure program is currently community driven, and
I've taken steps to prevent this from happening to other reports. That
is unfortunate and is completely our fault. Now disclosure for assumed
active bugs outside of our program is still for sure the wrong thing
to do always especially when not accompanied by an email to our
security@...crete5.org address. This would've been resolved quickly
had it been sent to our security@...crete5.org email, so I'd suggest
falling back to that in the future.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Simo Ben youssef <simo@...xploit.com> wrote:
> Korvin,
>
> You need to get your facts right before pointing fingers.
> First of all and as we stated in our advisory on the 9th of December 2014,
> the vulnerabilities were discovered on the 2nd of November 2014 to affect
> 5.7.2 (and 5.7.2.1 later on December) which was the the latest version at
> that time (As downloaded from concrete5.org).
> The fix on your github was pushed on the 10th of December 2014, a day after
> we published our advisory on FD and Bugtraq.
> You accuse us of being irresponsible and unprofessional for not disclosing
> the vulnerabilities to you first and it's not true since we contacted you
> twice through your security program at HackerOne (Report #33848) which
> hasn't been even "triaged" yet.
>
> I think what's really unprofessional is your inability to monitor your own
> security programs while putting the blame on people who reach out to you to
> help you fix your flaws.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Korvin Szanto <Korvin@...tlandlabs.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> This has been fixed in 5.7.3 for some time
>>
>> https://github.com/concrete5/concrete5-5.7.0/commit/e3d47d2af88ddef36deaf754ef22f1f39b9b623b
>>
>> We have a security disclosure program for this so any disclosure
>> outside of our program is very irresponsible and unprofessional. You
>> end up with outdated information and leave us unable to fix the issue
>> in a secure way since we cannot see it until it's brought to our
>> attention through our disclosure program.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Henri Salo <henri@...v.fi> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Can you assign CVE identifier for following vulnerability in Concrete5,
>> > thanks.
>> >
>> > http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2014/Dec/53
>> > http://osvdb.org/115633
>> > http://osvdb.org/115634
>> >
>> > ps. there is something wrong with
>> > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/ it
>> > says "an error occurred while processing this directive"
>> >
>> > - --
>> > Henri Salo
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>> >
>> > iEYEARECAAYFAlSm9P4ACgkQXf6hBi6kbk+bfQCgjF/EWeO4Wfs0SUSsq96LwNpE
>> > AWAAn1yKEw9eDAlJ6cQczjzHZ7VGdXUp
>> > =0mVH
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
> --
> Simo Ben youssef
> Vulnerability Research Engineer
> O: (708) 629-6922 M: (312) 725-8043
> MorXploit Research
> www.morxploit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
