[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 01:50:53 +0300
From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@...me.ru>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Imagemagick fuzzing bug
On 2014-12-25 00:32, Gynvael Coldwind wrote:
>> You are aware that there is graphicsmagick which shares lots of code
>> with im (it's an early fork)? It'd be nice to also report these issues
>> to them if they apply. (I also reported a couple of issues in both
>> im/gm lately and devs were always quick to fix things)
>>
>
> Do you know if either im or gm backport fixes from each other?
> I fuzzed only im, so I've reported to im. I don't mind reporting to both in
> the future, but if they DO backport fixes, that would lead into collisions
> (i.e. two different fixes for one bug, makes merging harder).
I don't know about security fixes specifically but they have this in the
FAQ:
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/FAQ.html#how-often-does-graphicsmagick-pick-up-new-code-from-imagemagick
GraphicsMagick never picks up new code from ImageMagick as distributed
by ImageMagick Studio LLC. [...]
--
Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
