Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:27:04 +1100
From: Murray McAllister <mmcallis@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Buffer overflow in antiword 0.37

On 12/02/2014 03:18 AM, Fabian Keil wrote:
> The attached patch prevents a buffer overflow in antiword 0.37
> (http://www.winfield.demon.nl/):
>
> Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
> 0x000000000044b55b in vName2String (szName=0x80140d58c "\"\037\202 \306!n\"n#n$n3", aucBytes=0x7fffffffde20 "\"", tNameSize=32767) at wordole.c:74
> 74			*pcChar = (char)aucBytes[tIndex];
> (gdb) f 1
> #1  0x00000000004499f2 in bGetPPS (pFile=0x800c19190, aulRootList=0x801409060, tRootListLen=4, pPPS=0x7fffffffe3b0) at wordole.c:262
> 262			vName2String(atPPSlist[iIndex].szName, aucBytes, tNameSize);
> (gdb) l -
> 257				atPPSlist = xfree(atPPSlist);
> 258				return FALSE;
> 259			}
> 260			tNameSize = (size_t)usGetWord(0x40, aucBytes);
> 261			tNameSize = (tNameSize + 1) / 2;
> 262			vName2String(atPPSlist[iIndex].szName, aucBytes, tNameSize);
> 263			atPPSlist[iIndex].ucType = ucGetByte(0x42, aucBytes);
> 264			if (atPPSlist[iIndex].ucType == 5) {
> 265				iRootIndex = iIndex;
> 266			}
> (gdb) p sizeof(atPPSlist[iIndex].szName)
> $1 = 32
> (gdb) p tNameSize
> $2 = 32767
> (gdb) l vName2String
> 56	/*
> 57	 * vName2String - turn the name into a proper string.
> 58	 */
> 59	static void
> 60	vName2String(char *szName, const UCHAR *aucBytes, size_t tNameSize)
> 61	{
> 62		char	*pcChar;
> 63		size_t	tIndex;
> 64	
> 65		fail(aucBytes == NULL || szName == NULL);
> (gdb) l
> 66	
> 67		if (tNameSize < 2) {
> 68			szName[0] = '\0';
> 69			return;
> 70		}
> 71		for (tIndex = 0, pcChar = szName;
> 72		     tIndex < 2 * tNameSize;
> 73		     tIndex += 2, pcChar++) {
> 74			*pcChar = (char)aucBytes[tIndex];
> 75		}
> (gdb)
> 76		szName[tNameSize - 1] = '\0';
> 77	} /* end of vName2String */
>
> The buffer overflow has been reported upstream and the patch was accepted,
> but apparently there will not be an official antiword release any time soon.
>
> The bug was found with afl-fuzz.
>
> Fabian
>

This issue was assigned CVE-2014-8123 on the distros list.

Cheers,

--
Murray McAllister / Red Hat Product Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.