Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:32:09 +0400 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: pam_timestamp internals Hi, On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 01:46:43PM +0100, Sebastian Krahmer wrote: > When playing with some PAM modules for my own projects, I came > across some implications of pam_timestamp (which is part of > upstream linux-pam) that should probably be addressed. > > Most importantly, there seems to be a path traversal issue: Thanks, Sebastian! The issue has been fixed in upstream linux-pam by commit https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/linux-pam.git/commit/?id=Linux-PAM-1_1_8-32-g9dcead8 -- ldv [ CONTENT OF TYPE application/pgp-signature SKIPPED ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ