Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:30:50 -0500 (EST)
From: cve-assign@...re.org
To: abn@...hat.com
Cc: cve-assign@...re.org, oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Neo4J CSRF: Potential CVE candidate

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Last August, Dinis Cruz wrote a blog entry detailing a CSRF attack

> http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/08/neo4j-csrf-payload-to-start-processes.html

> on a Neo4J Server resulting in an RCE. The server's documentation
> mentions the following.
> 
>   "By default, the Neo4j Server comes with some places where arbitrary
>   code code execution can happen. These are the Section 19.15,

> This could mean that the RCE itself is not CVE worthy as it is a
> documented/expected behavior. However, should the CSRF flaw be
> considered a vulnerability and assigned a CVE?

Use CVE-2013-7259 for the CSRF. There is no CVE assignment for the
documented Section 19.15 behavior.

- -- 
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSxvNhAAoJEKllVAevmvmscdkH/2ujYyUGrDQwoSXdENDgUCAS
fpyQfXnbL6dATF41P8y4cz7e7lCUMb/RxFJ6WBsLd/smCS/K9Q4yF0l4VAwp+2bg
Ztxcqzz4mQafgXGwAcKMtQ6ZXSk4I9r67PlBcFdO/mddhaLUDQT3MTxYBGJVfJSP
NlIuCp49QGJGpypRssK0bFkmLymHY9bMrz7n2EzgzPbk4GilVRhBrjEo3R2oJtKW
DZfRT8JO3op/3515wGXu0jeOtlKQg+YcKJbkpD3jwzmOANQsSFtfKgzNEUU9GCMt
XO7FYhLg4RyPs9/Lgy1AuFO/crqAck2SLyNTl7rd0KEKLgeANm1j8km4itnvZ+0=
=/rAS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ