[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:22:38 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>, mejo@...ian.org, contribute@...ios.org
Subject: Re: CVE request: unauthorized host/service views displayed
in servicegroup view
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2013 11:27 AM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> * [2013-07-10 17:17:08 +0200] Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Am 2013-07-08 20:16, schrieb Kurt Seifried:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 06/26/2013 01:42 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
>>>> On 06/26/2013 12:36 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
>>>>> I don't believe a CVE has been assigned to this issue yet.
>>>>
>>>>> It was reported that Nagios 3.4.4 at least, and possibly
>>>>> earlier versions, would allow users with access to Nagios
>>>>> to obtain full access to the servicegroup overview, even if
>>>>> they are not authorized to view all of the systems (not
>>>>> configured for this ability in the authorized_for_*
>>>>> configuration option). This includes the servicegroup
>>>>> overview, summary, and grid.
>>>>
>>>>> Provided the user has access to view some services, they
>>>>> will be able to see all services (including those they
>>>>> should not see). Note that the user in question must have
>>>>> access to some services and must have access to Nagios to
>>>>> begin with.
>>>>
>>>>> This has not yet been corrected upstream.
>>>>
>>>>> References:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg39749.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=456
>>>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714171
>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978531
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Please use CVE-2013-2214 for this issue.
>>>
>>> It appears there are may be some problems with this issue,
>>> potentially this may have been a bad configuration and not a
>>> source code based problem, however we haven't been able to
>>> confirm it yet. I've also not been able to contact upstream
>>> about this easily (no security@ address, if anyone know whom to
>>> forward this to, please let me know, thanks.
>>
>> I'm wondering why you fail to reproduce this issue. I posted
>> some details regarding my setup at the Nagios Tracker:
>> http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=456
>>
>> Unfortunately Nagios upstream sometimes rather unresponsive. At
>> least that's what I observed.
>>
>> Please let me know if you need any further details regarding the
>> bug or advice on how to reproduce it.
>
> To close the loop on this, the CVE should probably be rejected.
> According to upstream, this is done by design. One of our users
> noted it in our bugzilla:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978531#c11
>
> He has a thorough explanation, but the bottom line is this seems to
> be by design, as noted in the changelog:
>
> http://www.nagios.org/projects/nagioscore/history/core-3x
>
> * Users can now see hostgroups and servicegroups that contain at
> least one host or service they are authorized for, instead of
> having to be authorized for them all (Ethan Galstad)
>
> I suspect this CVE should be rejected as this is done by design.
>
Agreed. Please REJECT CVE-2013-2214
- --
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)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=NCWl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
