Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:16:42 +0200 From: Alexander Bergmann <abergmann@...e.com> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE request: libraw: multiple issues On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:51:14PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hi again, > > On 29 May 2013 20:00, Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote: > > On 05/29/2013 03:18 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> On 28 May 2013 19:58, Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote: > >>> On 05/28/2013 02:43 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >>>> So there's a double-free (fixed in 0.15.2) > >> > >> https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/commit/19ffddb0fe1a4ffdb459b797ffcf7f490d28b5a6 > > > > Please use CVE-2013-2126 for this issue. > > FWIW, I've noticed that libkdcraw and darktable embed copies of libraw > that are vulnerable to the double free. In which libraw version was this problem actually introduced? darktable uses embedded libraw 0.14.7 libkdcraw uses embedded libraw 0.15.0 I found a commit that introduced the "// allocate image as temporary buffer, size" stuff within commit 1a8e92ff, and that was part of 0.14.0. Regards, Alex -- Alexander Bergmann <abergmann@...e.com> Security Software Engineer SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) [ CONTENT OF TYPE application/pgp-signature SKIPPED ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ