[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:46:32 -0700
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>, Steven Christey <coley@...re.org>
Subject: Re: DoS vulnerability in the BIND resolver (and potentially
others)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2013 03:26 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Scott Brynen described a behavioral change in some of the UltraDNS
> authorative name servers:
>
> <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2013-January/009501.html>
>
> Mark Andrews of ISC confirmed that this triggers a denial of
> service condition in the BIND recursive resolver:
>
> <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2013-January/009506.html>
>
> I think he is right, but this obviously has to be fixed in the
> resolver. Can this be assigned a CVE?
Uhmm I'm going to defer to Steven on this one:
1) is this a security issue? I'm not totally convinced it is. It's
definitely broken behaviour.
2) Does this get a single CVE or one per broken client software?
- --
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=JWSN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
