[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:31:13 -0600
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Raphael Geissert <geissert@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: Re: CVE request: LetoDMS, more issues
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/30/2012 01:28 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Friday 05 October 2012 23:11:36 Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some more issues were fixed in LetoDMS...
>>
>> * Fixed in 3.3.8 Multiple XSS:
>> http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms/branches/letoDMS-3.3.x/inc/
>>
>>
inc.ClassUI.php?r1=930&r2=929&pathrev=930
>> http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms/branches/letoDMS-3.3.x/out
>>
>>
/out.DocumentNotify.php?r1=934&r2=933&pathrev=934 (and a few others
>> scattered in multiple other commits)
Please use CVE-2012-4567 for this issue.
>> Missing CSRF protection (all part of the same thing):
>> http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms?view=revision&revision=927
>>
>>
http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms?view=revision&revision=915
>> http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms?view=revision&revision=914
>>
>>
http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms?view=revision&revision=907
>> (and possibly some others...)
Please use CVE-2012-4568 for this issue.
>> * Fixed in 3.3.9 Multiple XSS in out/out.UsrMgr.php:
>> http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms/branches/letoDMS-3.3.x/out/
>>
>>
out.UsrMgr.php?r1=979&r2=978&pathrev=979
Please use CVE-2012-4569 for this issue.
>> Regression in the above patch (fixed after the release of
>> 3.3.9):
>> http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms/branches/letoDMS-3.3.x/out
>>
>>
/out.UsrMgr.php?r1=982&r2=981&pathrev=982
Does this regression cause a security issue (e.g. did accidentally
putting htmlspecialchars() in actually cause a new XSS?).
>> LetoDMS Core: * Fixed in 3.3.8: SQL injection:
>> http://mydms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mydms/branches/letoDMS-3.3.x/Leto
>>
>>
DMS_Core/Core/inc.ClassDMS.php?r1=929&r2=928&pathrev=929
Please use CVE-2012-4570 for this issue.
> Could CVE ids be assigned please?
>
> Thanks,
>
- --
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=Z9ZU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
