[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:50:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
Attila Bogar <attila.bogar@...guamatics.com>,
Raphael Geissert <geissert@...ian.org>
Subject: CVE Request -- mcrypt: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption /
decryption of overly long file names
Hello Kurt, Steve, vendors,
Attila Bogar reported a stack-based buffer overflow
in the way MCrypt, a crypt() package and crypt(1) command
replacement, used to encrypt / decrypt files with overly
long names (longer than 128 bytes). A remote attacker
could provide a specially-crafted file that, when processed
by the mcrypt too, would lead to mcrypt executable crash [*].
A different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4409:
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-4409
Note: Using Red Hat bugzilla record for CVE-2012-4409 since
particular Mitre record is not described yet.
References:
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867790
Patch proposed by Attila:
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867790#c0
Reproducer:
To reproduce let mcrypt encrypt / decrypt file with name
longer ~128 bytes.
Could you allocate a CVE id for this?
Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
[*] FORTIFY_SOURCE protection mechanism would mitigate this
deficiency to result into crash only. But on systems, without
FORTIFY_SOURCE protection being applied, the impact might be
higher.
P.S.: I am not sure about relation of this issue to the issue
Raphael Geissert reported previously:
[4] http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/02/1
so CC-in him too, he to clarify if [2] == [4], or if
they are yet different issues. Raphael, please clarify.
Thanks, Jan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ