[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:42:31 +0200
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: Reed Loden <reed@...dloden.com>
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
Elio Maldonado <emaldona@...hat.com>,
Robert Relyea <rrelyea@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- nss: Did honour /pkcs11.txt and /secmod.db files
by initialization
Cc-ing Reed on this post yet, so he could clarify
if Mozilla (Security) Team has already assigned a CVE identifier
for this one or not.
Reed?
Thanks && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
On 10/24/2011 12:30 PM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello Josh, Steve, vendors,
>
> a security flaw was found in the way nss, the Network Security
> Services (NSS) set of libraries, performed their initialization (the
> file path for "pkcs11.txt" configuration file was constructed
> incorrectly). When that configuration file was loaded from remote WebDAV
> or Samba CIFS share, it could lead to arbitrary security module
> load, potentially leading to execution of arbitrary code (execution of
> code from untrusted security module).
>
> Upstream bug report:
> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641052
>
> Other references:
> [2] https://secunia.com/advisories/46557/
> [3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388045
> [4] http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=97426#c8
> [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748379
>
> Could you allocate a CVE id for this? (as it looks there isn't one
> for this deficiency yet)
>
> Thank you && Regards, Jan.
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
