[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:11:32 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: LZW decompression issues
* Tomas Hoger:
> Following bugzillas list various code bases that were checked for the
> issue and if they are affected or not:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2895
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2896
Not good. 8-(
Looking at <http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=4.3BSD-Reno/src/usr.bin/compress/compress.c>,
it seems that these constants
| char_type lmask[9] = {0xff, 0xfe, 0xfc, 0xf8, 0xf0, 0xe0, 0xc0, 0x80, 0x00};
| char_type rmask[9] = {0x00, 0x01, 0x03, 0x07, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x3f, 0x7f, 0xff};
can be used to build signatures to spot candidate binaries.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
