date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:56:58 +0200 from: "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" <bero@...linux.ch> to: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE request -- coreutils -- tty hijacking possible in "su" via TIOCSTI ioctl On Friday, June 10, 2011 11:55 CEST, Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de> wrote: > The issue also reminds me that there are several su implemenations. > On Fedora and SUSE we have a patched coreutils version, Debian uses > the one from shadow-utils and then there's also a su from > SimplePAMApps, used by e.g. Owl. Of course each one has it's own > quirks and weird features. Does anyone still remember why a > particular implementation was chosen? :-) In Ark Linux, we switched from the coreutils one to the shadow-utils one about 2 years ago because the shadow-utils one does what we need (incl. PAM support) without having to port the PAM patch on every new coreutils release. ttyl bero
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ