Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:56:58 +0200
from: "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" <bero@...linux.ch>
to: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request -- coreutils -- tty hijacking possible in "su" via TIOCSTI ioctl

On Friday, June 10, 2011 11:55 CEST, Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de> wrote: 
 
> The issue also reminds me that there are several su implemenations.
> On Fedora and SUSE we have a patched coreutils version, Debian uses
> the one from shadow-utils and then there's also a su from
> SimplePAMApps, used by e.g. Owl. Of course each one has it's own
> quirks and weird features. Does anyone still remember why a
> particular implementation was chosen? :-)


In Ark Linux, we switched from the coreutils one to the shadow-utils one about 2 years ago because the shadow-utils one does what we need (incl. PAM support) without having to port the PAM patch on every new coreutils release.

ttyl
bero

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ