Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:11:19 +0100
From: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>, 
	Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson <helgi@....net>
Subject: Re: CVE Request: PEAR Installer 1.9.1 <= - Symlink Attack

hi,

2011/2/28 Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>:
> I'm not familiar with this code or any of the context surrounding this
> fix, but it appears to be an incomplete fix.  Checking for existence
> of a symlink and then opening the resource leaves open a window during
> which a legitimate file can be replaced with a symlink.

Not sure it is fixable, or maybe using a lock on the symbolic link
while fetching its target (to be tested to be sure that such locks
cannot be overridden from shell).

> Also, I don't see a reason why a hard link couldn't be used for exploitation
> instead.

Hard link are not detectable (lstat), they are treated like normal files.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.