[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:30:30 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: Qt SSL endless loop
* [2010-08-20 16:56:02 -0400] Steven M. Christey wrote:
>Just to close this up. I have actually preserved CVE-2010-2621 and
>have marked CVE-2010-2533 as a duplicate, which is contrary to what
>Vincent said.
Bah, just re-read the below thing and you're entirely right, and this
was what I meant (looking at our bug, we never used 2533, and left 2621
as it was). My intention was to note the newly _assigned_ one as a dupe
and I was apparently concentrating on the larger number when I wrote the
response.
Sorry about that, that probably created a healthy dose of confusion.
>MITRE is ultimately the authority on which CVE should be rejected
>when duplicates arise. See
>http://cve.mitre.org/cve/editorial_policies/duplicates.html for the
>criteria that I generally follow (every once in a while, a behemoth
>"authoritative source" wins, though generally there is an expectation
>that their ID will become more ubiquitous in the future anyway.)
No problem at all. Thanks for the clarification here Steve.
>On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Vincent Danen wrote:
>
>>* [2010-07-19 10:49:36 +0200] Ludwig Nussel wrote:
>>
>>>Vincent Danen wrote:
>>>>* [2010-07-16 11:19:09 -0400] Josh Bressers wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please use CVE-2010-2533
>>>>
>>>>Wasn't this already assigned CVE-2010-2621?
>>>>
>>>>http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2621
>>>>
>>>>It links to the same advisory (qtsslame-adv.txt) and that only seems to
>>>>be reporting one single problem.
>>>
>>>Oops, indeed. We've overlooked that assignment. Sorry for the confusion :-/
>>
>>No problem. We need to discard the new one then (discard CVE-2010-2621
>>as a dupe of CVE-2010-2533).
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
