[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:00:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- perl v5.8.* -- stack overflow by
processing certain regex (Gentoo BTS#313565 / RH BZ#580605)
As MITRE didn't reply, I'm going to assign CVE-2010-1158 to this to cover Perl.
We can address other things on a case by case basis if needed.
Thanks.
--
JB
----- "Jan Lieskovsky" <jlieskov@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve, vendors,
>
> 1, wouldn't like to open a can of worms,
> 2, but for purpose of properly tracking it, requesting a CVE id for
> the
> following Perl regular expression engine issue:
>
> Bruce Merry reported:
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313565
>
> an integer overflow, leading to stack overflow in the way
> Perl regular expression engine processed certain regular
> expression(s). Remote attacker could use this flaw to cause
> a denial of service (crash of an application, using the
> Perl regular expression engine).
>
> Public PoC from [1]:
> --------------------
> perl -e 'if ((("a " x 100000) . "a\n") =~ /\A\S+(?: \S+)*\n\z/)
> {}'
>
> References:
> [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313565
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580605
>
> Affected Perl versions:
> Issue tested and confirmed in Perl of versions v5.8.*.
> Versions of Perl v5.10.* are not affected by this.
>
> Steve, what's the Mitre's opinion on cases like this --
> denial of service reachable via certain regular expression.
>
> Should we track them on per issue basis? Or only for cases,
> where more than a DoS is possible? (doesn't seem to be
> this case though).
>
> Thanks && Regards, Jan.
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ