[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:05:26 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CVE request - kernel: race in ptrace
On 02/10/2010 09:02 PM, Eugene Teo wrote:
> On 02/09/2010 02:34 PM, Eugene Teo wrote:
>> Discovered by Tavis Ormandy. "The race involves interaction between a
>> tracer, a tracee and an antagonist. The tracer is tracing the tracee
>> with PTRACE_SYSCALL and waits on the tracee. In the mean time, an
>> antagonist blasts the tracee with SIGCONTs.
>>
>> The observed issue is that sometimes when the tracer attempts to
>> continue the tracee with PTRACE_SYSCALL, it gets a return value of
>> -ESRCH, indicating that the tracee is already running (or not being
>> traced). It turns out that a SIGCONT wakes up the tracee in kernel mode,
>> and for a moment the tracee's state is TASK_RUNNING then in ptrace_stop
>> we hit the condition where the tracee is found to be running (and thus
>> not traced). If the syscall is repeated, the
>> second time it usually succeeds (because by that time, the tracee has
>> been put into TASK_TRACED)."
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/8/327
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563073
>
> Hold on with assigning a CVE name for this. We are still investigating
> this issue.
False alarm ;)
http://marc.info/?t=126566675000008
Thanks, Eugene
--
Eugene Teo / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ