[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:16:58 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Mark J Cox <mjc@...hat.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CVE request - kernel: ima: fix null pointer dereference
On 02/10/2010 12:13 AM, Mark J Cox wrote:
>>> Do we need CVE numbers for issues that never showed up in a released
>>> kernel version? I don't see how this could affect anyone, unless they
>>> were foolish enough to ship a product on a non-released kernel :)
>>
>> You got a point there, but I requested this in order to keep track of
>> security issues that we might need to backport in our future kernels.
>
> It shouldn't get a CVE name. If someone at some point in the future
> ships a vulnerable version (by selective backporting, or similar) then
> it would get a name. Cheers, Mark
Thanks for clarifying.
Eugene
--
Eugene Teo / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ