[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:33:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
To: oss-security <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>
cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: Duplicate CVE assignment notification [was: CVE
id request: django]
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> two CVE ids have been assigned for this issue:
>
> CVE-2009-3695 and CVE-2009-3610.
>
> Will take CVE-2009-3695 as the proper one, as it has description already.
> CVE-2009-3610 should be rejected.
I agree with this: keep CVE-2009-3695.
CVE-2009-3695 was created off a Debian advisory that didn't list a CVE.
I assume that CVE-2009-3610 was being used for pre-disclosure coordination
by the Red Hat CNA.
- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ