[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:41:31 +0200
From: Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: clamav clamd and clamscan DoS and bypass by malformated archive
Am Donnerstag 09 April 2009 schrieb Tomas Hoger:
> Upstream 0.95.1 seems to fix at least 2 other issues that may be of
> interest:
>
> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1552
> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1553
>
> svn diff -c 5032 http://svn.clamav.net/svn/clamav-devel/
Stupid question but is it common clamav policy to not mention security
releases? Anyone any info about that?
This is a bit frightening for a "security" product (they have a menu
point "security" on their website but it seems they don't tend to fill it
with information...)
--
Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/
GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail: hanno@...eck.de
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
