[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:29:22 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Lua 5.1.4
* Kees Cook:
> Has anyone looked at the Lua fixes[1] in 5.1.4? I'm not familiar with the
> codebase, but it seems that several may have security implications:
As far as I can see, they have security implications if you run
untrusted script code (or untrusted bytecode). I don't think we've
got such software in our code base, but I might be mistaken.
There are additional issues if you run untrusted bytecode, these
issues haven't been fixed (and are very difficult to fix).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ