Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:49:11 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: smithj@...ethemallocs.com, coley@...us.mitre.org,
        Bram Moolenaar
 <Bram@...lenaar.net>,
        "Charles E Campbell, Jr" <drchip@...pbellfamily.biz>,
        Jan Minar <rdancer@...ncer.org>
Subject: Re: Re: More arbitrary code executions in Netrw
 version 125, Vim 7.2a.10

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:12:42 -0800 Jonathan Smith
<smithj@...ethemallocs.com> wrote:

> Tomas Hoger wrote:
> > Jonathan, did new netrw tests work for you?  With which vim version?
> > They all failed for me with vim 7.1.245 / netrw 109.
> 
> No vulnerability was found for me for vim 7.1.213 with netrw 109, as
> compiled for rPath Linux.

Even with jjD instead of jD in do_tiocsti?

-- 
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.