[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:04:40 -0400
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: list: members vs. read-only subscribers
On 8 April 2008, Solar Designer wrote:
> >
> > * The current member list can post unmoderated
> > * New subscribers (anyone can subscribe) will be moderated by default, but
> > can have the moderation flag lifted when the prove to be useful
> > contributors (we need to define what a useful contributor is)
> > * Non members can post, but will be moderated (if spam is an issue, we
> > could consider just throwing this stuff out, but I'd really like to avoid
> > it if possible)
> >
...
>
> I am OK with your proposal, although I think that we could simply do
> message moderation for all instead, with a few moderators.
I'm pretty sure this is going to get old real fast, and is going to
needlessly slow down communication. I presume this is only being kicked
around as an idea because of missing features in the list backend?
>
> Anyway, should we (Openwall) interpret the above as a request to go
> ahead and apply the changes?
>
Have the gears started turning that will make this happen yet? I'm not in
a big rush, I just don't want this conversation to be forgotten.
Thanks.
--
JB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
