Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 15:25:34 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] iconv: fix to=utf32 to behave like utf32be
 (not... ascii?)

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 01:06:57PM -0500, Will Dietz wrote:
> Hmm this is more complicated than I originally thought.
> I'm not sure I understand the current behavior,
> but am less convinced this is a clear improvement.

Can you explain what you're confused about? It seems ok.

> Thoughts/comments appreciated :).
> 
> ~Will
> 
> PS: Did we discuss this years ago? I thought so, but can't find it anywhere...

I don't think so. UTF-32 did not exist as a different case from
UTF-32BE until this year.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ