[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:06:08 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: tcmalloc compatibility
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:50:24PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Szabolcs Nagy:
>
> > even with the very small set of libc apis that a malloc
> > interposer may want to use, there known (but undocumented)
> > caveats:
> >
> > - glibc dlsym calls calloc (bites anybody who tries to wrap
> > calloc in the usual way)
>
> That's not what I meant with an interposed malloc. Any such partial
> interposition is going to be very tricky indeed.
I don't understand. By "partial interposition" do you mean partial in
the sense of "wrapping and calling the original via dlsym" or in the
sense of "replacing some but not all allocator functions"?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
