Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:03:56 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] split __libc_start_main.c into two files (Wasm)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:51:31PM +0000, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've got some more patches to try and get in for Wasm support.
> 
> Here's one that should be fairly straightforward? In Musl, most
> (non-static) functions are in a file of their own, which is good
> from a linkage point of view.
> 
> I'd like to have __libc_start_main.c split into two files, because
> for Wasm I'd like to be able to call __libc_start_init (from within
> the CRT directory) but without having to link in exit(), since many
> Wasm applications will never call exit() and won't necessarily use
> main.
> 
> There's no pollution of the codebase, it's purely splitting a file.
> 
> Patch below.

__libc_start_init is intentionally not a public interface but part of
musl internals. There is no reason to assume it will continue to exist
with the same name or interface in future versions of musl. The public
interface for the entry point is __libc_start_main.

exit() is literally 9 instructions on x86_64, and likely comparably
small elsewhere. I don't see how trying to optimize it out makes
sense. The bulk of the code that runs at exit() when there's
nontrivial work to do at exit time is linked through dependencies from
other sources like stdio and atexit, and would be linked even if you
succeeded in optimizing exit out.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ