Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:53:33 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Feasability of patching libm with OS X 10.5.8 libc for IBM double-double in PPC * ardi <ardillasdelmonte@...il.com> [2017-12-06 18:23:33 +0100]: > Said this, I need IBM double-double in PowerPC targets (using clang as > compiler), and I'd like to use musl because of its well written code. is this because of some abi compat issue? or some source code depends on double-double semantics? in musl you can do various hacks to make most things work, but complete support is non-trivial so if you can work around the double-double requirement that may be better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ