Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:41:32 -0800
From: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: expectations for a_ctz_64(0)

Currently the generic and aarch64 versions of a_ctz_64() give
different results for 0:

  a_ctz_64_generic(0) : 0
  a_ctz_64_aarch64(0) : 64

That doesn't matter for the ffs functions, but for the other users of
a_ctz_l and a_ctz_64 (ie malloc and qsort) it's less clear.

Does musl rely on a specific behaviour?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ