[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 20:02:12 +0300 (MSK)
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@...ras.ru>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Documentation of memcpy and undefined behavior in
memset
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Rich Felker wrote:
> FWIW, I think GCC may do aggressive optimization based on the
> assumption that memcpy implies the pointer points to an object (of
> size at least 1)
The compiler can deduce that the pointer is non-null (and that's
fine), but otherwise I don't see what possible optimizations could
take place. Did you have something specific in mind?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
