[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 10:29:02 -0400
From: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com>
To: musl <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Cc: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 32 bit musl?
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com> wrote:
> Rich's musl-cross-make builds 32-bit executables that use musl libs. It
> kills two birds with one stone. That's great.
>
> But it appears to expect musl libc to be installed in /lib for dynamically
> linked executables. That's not an option for me. Is there a way I can
> override this?
>
>
Thanks Laurent, I used symbolic link in /lib for testing on my development
machine. That works well. But I don't have reasonable access to root user
when I deploy for production.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
