[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:52:15 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: RUSAGE_THREAD
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 04:00:45PM +0100, Raphael Cohn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of compiling ZFS on Linux against musl. ZFS seems to
> make a few slightly glibc-like assumptions, one of which is the use of
> RUSAGE_THREAD. Musl seems to lack a definition of this in sys/resource.h.
> Is this deliberate?
>
> Glibc defines RUSAGE_THREAD as 1, but musl already uses this value for
> RUSAGE_CHILDREN (glibc sets this as -1). What would be the correct value
> for RUSAGE_THREAD with musl?
Maybe this is incorrect in musl then. Can anyone confirm? The values
are determined by (i.e. have to match) the kernel.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
