[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:45:42 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: make install permissions
* Philip Deegan <philip.deegan@...il.com> [2016-06-06 21:54:02 +0100]:
> I'm trying out musl and I noticed that even when "--prefix" is used for
> "configure", "make install" still tries to put a symlink in "/lib".
>
> Is this intentional?
>
of course the dynamic linker name is part of the abi,
if you change that then you loose binary portability.
you can still change it by configuring musl with
different --syslibdir
> I rather keep my system directories clean and isolate my dev stuff.
>
the binaries will have non-standard interpreter path
in them, so they will only work with that particular
path setup.
> Thanks
>
> PS. Is there a "musl-g++.specs" floating around anywhere?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
