[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:21:00 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Clang static analyser results
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:56:33PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> > On Mar 2, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I ran clang static analyser on tip of git today for x86_64 build. The results are here
Thanks!
> > https://busybox.net/~kraj/scan-build-2016-03-02-222206-32091-1/
>
> and
>
> https://busybox.net/~kraj/scan-build-2016-03-02-225259-30448-1/
>
> is arm cross built with clang as CC
Any idea why the results are different for arm? Most of the code where
things are reported does not differ by arch.
I think everything reported has been investigated before and found to
be false positives. Do any of them look new/interesting?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
