[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:34:45 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Open/pending issues as of Jan 17
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:25:30PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> random stuff:
> - linux 4.* uapi (includes mlock2, but a lot of other stuff too)
Done.
> - symbol versioning (for at least gcc-6 libgcc_s.so)
This is a fairly invasive change and needs testing and possibly
further discussion. It's big enough I'd like to allocate it attention
on the roadmap for a specific release cycle. It's tentatively a
secondary target for the next cycle but we could move it up to primary
if this is becoming a serious problem.
> - __cxa_thread_atexit_impl ? (i expect this to come up in real code)
It looks to me like gcc emulates it with a pthread key to get a dtor
and doesn't actually need help from the libc. If so I don't think it
makes sense to bother with doing a better implementation on the libc
side unless/until we can resolve the lazy allocation bug in their ABI.
> - stdatomic.h
Let's look at this later.
> - string functions correctness
I don't think there's much that can be done aside from adding the
may_alias attribute. But at least that small improvement can go on the
agenda for the next release cycle.
> - regex bre extensions \+ \? \|
Possibly going to apply this now unless you see a risk of breaking
anything else.
> - regcomp increase tre_stack_new limit
Sounds ok to apply now but I lost track of where the patch is.
> - str{f,p}time %z %Z %k %l ?
> - noreturn __assert_fail ?
> - hidden visibility for internal functions
Let's look at these after release.
> - compiler builtins in libc (sqrt, fabs, memcpy..)
> - asm -> inline asm
A little bit of this was done (for arm) but I'd like to continue where
it makes sense.
> - ld128 math
Yes, that would be nice. Should we set a specific roadmap goal for
adding it or at least adding the most important stuff (like sqrtl)
that's currently badly broken.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
