[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:12:35 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add PowerPC soft-float support
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:20:52PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Some PowerPC CPUs (e.g. Freescale MPC85xx) have a completely different
> instruction set for floating point operations (SPE).
> Executing regular PowerPC floating point instructions results in
> "Illegal instruction" errors.
>
> Make it possible to run these devices in soft-float mode.
If their fpu is ieee conforming (this is probably a big if) it should
be possible for them to run in hard-float mode too, but the ABI is
still the soft-float ABI since floating point args and return values
get passed in GP registers. Just one question:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/bits/fenv.h b/arch/powerpc/bits/fenv.h
> index 2f722e6..c5a3e5c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/bits/fenv.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/bits/fenv.h
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +#ifdef _SOFT_FLOAT
> +#define FE_ALL_EXCEPT 0
> +#define FE_TONEAREST 0
> +#else
> #define FE_TONEAREST 0
> #define FE_TOWARDZERO 1
> #define FE_UPWARD 2
> @@ -24,6 +28,7 @@
Does the _SOFT_FLOAT macro accurately represent that the "soft float
ABI" (float args/returns in GP registers) is being used, or is it only
defined when floating point has been completely disabled?
Aside from this question, the patch looks great. Thanks!
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
