[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:57:10 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <khm@....org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and
search
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Where is the standard that defines ordering semantics in resolv.conf?
There isn't one, but that doesn't mean you get to ensconce the behavior
you like. That was my point.
> Search has to be ordered. You can not possibly argue otherwise?
I can and do.
> I am arguing for adding a very standard feature (search) to open musl to a
> whole new space of users.
You're not arguing for simple inclusion of search; you're arguing for
specific behavior that is impossible to implement in a sane manner,
because that's how glibc does it. I am not against domain and search,
but I don't just want functionality poorly added just to check some box
on a random other project's wishlist.
> Nobody is forcing you to use search paths or ndots.
Not sure how this is relevant? Nobody's forcing anyone to do anything.
What is your point?
khm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
